The Detroit Lions vs Dallas Cowboys match player stats show how Detroit won 44–30 at Ford Field on December 4, 2025. Jared Goff passed for 309 yards without an interception, while Jahmyr Gibbs scored three rushing touchdowns. Dak Prescott threw for 376 yards, but Dallas lost three turnovers and allowed five sacks.
This breakdown covers that specific Week 14 game. It explains the leading individual performances, the scoring changes and why Dallas finished with more offensive yards but still lost by two touchdowns.
Final Score and Team Stats
Dallas gained 417 total yards compared with Detroit’s 408. The Cowboys also held the ball longer, but those advantages did not produce enough touchdowns.
Detroit protected possession and made Dallas pay for mistakes. The Lions scored five offensive touchdowns, while the Cowboys scored two.
| Statistic | Detroit Lions | Dallas Cowboys |
|---|---|---|
| Final score | 44 | 30 |
| Total offensive yards | 408 | 417 |
| Net passing yards | 299 | 326 |
| Rushing yards | 109 | 91 |
| Turnovers committed | 0 | 3 |
| Sacks allowed | 1 | 5 |
| Time of possession | 28:37 | 31:23 |
The difference between individual passing yards and net team passing yards matters here. Prescott’s 376 passing yards became 326 net passing yards after Dallas lost 50 yards on sacks. Goff’s 309 became 299 after Detroit’s single sack.
The Cowboys’ official recap confirms that Dallas finished ahead in yardage and possession but failed to generate a takeaway. Those details explain why the overall yardage totals give an incomplete picture of the game. dallascowboys.com
Jared Goff vs Dak Prescott: Quarterback Stats
Prescott produced the larger passing total, but Goff delivered the more efficient performance. Both quarterbacks threw one touchdown pass; their interception and sack totals separated them.
| Quarterback | Completions/attempts | Passing yards | Passing TDs | Interceptions | Passer rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jared Goff, Detroit | 25/34 | 309 | 1 | 0 | 111.0 |
| Dak Prescott, Dallas | 31/47 | 376 | 1 | 2 | 79.7 |
Goff distributed the ball across several options. Jameson Williams and Amon-Ra St. Brown both approached 100 receiving yards, while Gibbs provided another productive outlet.
Prescott kept Dallas competitive through the air, particularly after the Cowboys fell behind. However, Detroit’s pressure repeatedly disrupted possessions, and his two interceptions gave the Lions additional opportunities.
Detroit’s official recap lists five sacks against Prescott: three by Al-Quadin Muhammad, one by Jack Campbell and one by Alim McNeill. Goff went down only once. detroitlions.com
The practical takeaway is straightforward: passing volume measures production, but it does not capture the full cost of lost possessions and negative plays.
Rushing Leaders: Gibbs Finished Drives, Montgomery Added a Breakaway
Gibbs did not need a huge rushing total to shape the result. His three touchdowns made him Detroit’s most important scoring threat.
David Montgomery supplied the Lions’ biggest rushing play, turning a second-quarter carry into a 35-yard touchdown.
| Player | Team | Carries | Rushing yards | Rushing TDs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jahmyr Gibbs | Lions | 12 | 43 | 3 |
| David Montgomery | Lions | 6 | 60 | 1 |
| Javonte Williams | Cowboys | 17 | 67 | 1 |
Gibbs also caught seven passes for 77 yards, giving him 120 yards from scrimmage. That combined total better reflects his influence than his rushing yards alone.
Montgomery averaged 10 yards per carry across his six attempts. Javonte Williams led Dallas with 67 rushing yards, but the Cowboys finished behind Detroit in team rushing production.
These figures appear in the game’s statistical reporting and show the different roles each back played: Gibbs converted scoring opportunities, Montgomery added an explosive run, and Williams supplied most of Dallas’ ground production. reuters.com
For anyone comparing the running backs, touchdowns and receiving work are essential context. Looking only at rushing yardage would understate Gibbs’ contribution.
Receiving Leaders and CeeDee Lamb’s Early Exit
CeeDee Lamb finished with the most receiving yards in the game despite leaving early in the third quarter with a concussion. Ryan Flournoy then gave Prescott another productive target.
Detroit spread its receiving production more evenly across its leading options.
| Player | Team | Receptions | Receiving yards |
|---|---|---|---|
| CeeDee Lamb | Cowboys | 6 | 121 |
| Ryan Flournoy | Cowboys | 9 | 115 |
| Jameson Williams | Lions | 7 | 96 |
| Amon-Ra St. Brown | Lions | 6 | 92 |
| Jahmyr Gibbs | Lions | 7 | 77 |
Flournoy caught a 42-yard touchdown in the fourth quarter. His nine receptions came on 13 targets, while Lamb caught six of eight targets before his injury, according to Dallas’ official postgame coverage. dallascowboys.com
Williams and St. Brown gave Goff two dependable ways to move the ball. Their contributions also prevented Dallas from treating Gibbs as Detroit’s only major offensive threat.
George Pickens finished with 37 receiving yards on nine targets. That limited return was another important part of the Cowboys’ passing story, even though Lamb and Flournoy both exceeded 100 yards.
The Cowboys’ statistical review also highlighted Detroit’s work after the catch and Dallas’ missed tackles. That supports the interpretation that the Lions’ passing success depended partly on what happened after completed throws. dallascowboys.com
Turnovers and Special Teams Changed the Game
Detroit’s three takeaways were more consequential than the narrow difference in total yardage.
Campbell forced a Jake Ferguson fumble that Brian Branch recovered. Derrick Barnes intercepted a pass deflected by Amik Robertson, and D.J. Reed collected another interception late in the fourth quarter.
The Lions converted the first two takeaways into touchdowns: Montgomery’s 35-yard run and a 12-yard Goff pass to Isaac TeSlaa. Reed’s interception helped close out the game. Detroit’s official recap identifies all three turnovers and their outcomes. detroitlions.com
Dallas did receive an outstanding kicking performance. Brandon Aubrey made all five field-goal attempts, connecting from 57, 42, 55, 63 and 29 yards.
However, field goals could only carry the comeback so far. Detroit repeatedly reached the end zone, forcing Dallas to keep chasing a growing scoring requirement.
Sam Williams also blocked a 52-yard Jake Bates field-goal attempt in the third quarter. That play gave Dallas an opening, but the Cowboys could not turn their special-teams successes into control of the game. dallascowboys.com
How the Score Developed
The scoring sequence shows that Dallas threatened a comeback before Detroit pulled away again.
| Stage | Score | Important development |
|---|---|---|
| End of first quarter | Lions 10–3 | Gibbs scored Detroit’s first touchdown |
| Halftime | Lions 20–9 | Montgomery’s touchdown helped build the lead |
| Early third quarter | Lions 27–9 | TeSlaa scored following Barnes’ interception |
| Fourth quarter | Lions 30–27 | Flournoy’s touchdown and a two-point conversion brought Dallas close |
| Final | Lions 44–30 | Gibbs added two fourth-quarter rushing touchdowns |
The NFL scoring summary establishes the early progression, including Detroit’s 20–9 halftime advantage and TeSlaa’s touchdown shortly after the break. Dallas’ recap documents the fourth-quarter rally and Detroit’s response. plus.philsteele.com
Dallas made the game competitive again, but its defense still needed stops. Detroit’s late scoring drives prevented the Cowboys from completing the turnaround.
Research Notes: What the Numbers Actually Explain
This article uses published game records and official team reporting. It does not claim firsthand attendance, player interviews or access to private team analysis.
The main editorial finding is that ball security, protection and touchdown production explain the result better than total yards. Dallas moved the ball, but Detroit avoided turnovers and turned two takeaways into immediate scoring opportunities.
Field position also deserves attention. Dallas’ statistical review reported that Detroit’s average starting position was its own 41-yard line, with Jacob Saylors and Tom Kennedy each exceeding 100 kickoff-return yards. That reduced the distance Detroit often needed to travel. dallascowboys.com
These are interpretations of documented results. They do not establish what coaches intended on every play or assign responsibility beyond the available evidence.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who won the Lions vs Cowboys game on December 4, 2025?
Detroit won 44–30 at Ford Field in Week 14 of the 2025 NFL season.
Who threw for more yards, Goff or Prescott?
Prescott threw for 376 yards, compared with Goff’s 309. Goff finished without an interception; Prescott threw two.
How many touchdowns did Jahmyr Gibbs score?
Gibbs scored three rushing touchdowns. He also contributed 77 receiving yards.
Who led the game in receiving yards?
CeeDee Lamb led with 121 receiving yards. Ryan Flournoy followed with 115.
Why did Dallas lose despite gaining more yards?
Dallas committed three turnovers, allowed five sacks and scored fewer touchdowns. Detroit also benefited from strong field position.
Conclusion
The Detroit Lions vs Dallas Cowboys match player stats describe a game decided by more than offensive volume. Prescott and Dallas produced more yards, but Goff protected possession, Gibbs finished drives and Detroit’s defense created valuable takeaways.
Detroit’s 44–30 victory on December 4, 2025, illustrates why turnovers, sacks and scoring efficiency must sit alongside passing and rushing totals in a useful game breakdown.
Read more :Washington Commanders vs Atlanta Falcons Match Player Stats: Inside Atlanta’s 34–27 Win
